Getting To The Point.
Has our nation become so democratic that we no longer view the facts as facts, but just one side of the story?
Granted, there are those subjects that are better determined by opinion, emotion and experience, but in some cases there are defined sets of facts that are clearly stated, yet ignored because they conflict with what we want to believe.
I once saw an experiment where two people voted on the sex of a rabbit. Even though the two votes were different, neither changed the fact that the rabbit was male/female.
This is where I see one of the biggest problems we face today. Information. To find out the sex of the rabbit, all you have to do is raise its leg, but how do we find the truth in more important matters? Matters where money and power, and the need for financial support can sway the information we’re given.
If it’s important to you that you know the truth, you may spend countless hours scouring documents to get the one piece of information you’re looking for, but if it’s something that doesn’t really matter or effect you on a personal basis, you just go with whatever opinion you like best because it’s just too time consuming to do otherwise. Possibly perpetuating the spreading of false facts.
A personal example of this:
I once tried to find out statistics about heart and lung disease in my home town. I heard that we are near the top of the list of areas for high industrial pollution (it was in the local paper,) but trying to match that against, say... the effects of second hand smoke, was damn near impossible. Those statistics are out there, I know they’re out there. But because they conflict with popular opinion, they’ve either been buried, or are just not available to the general public.
A more recent example:
Something about the hearing involving Michael Brown just didn’t sound right to me. If he were actually guilty of not doing his job, then why wasn’t he fired immediately? No ‘ifs’ ‘ands’ or ‘buts’ the man had a specific job to do, if he didn’t do it, why is there a debate? It took me less than ten minutes to find out exactly what his job entails. While it seems pretty open on what FEMA is suppose to do (seems to be mostly financial aid and coordinating resources,) it is quite clear what duties FEMA is not responsible for. My suspicions were right, from what we were shown of the hearing on the news, his actual duties were not even addressed.
And those are just two examples of the breakdown of knowledge.
So my final question is this: As the general public, how do we go about getting the actual facts when it seems that the actual facts are no longer important? How do we go about demanding to be told the truth?
Granted, there are those subjects that are better determined by opinion, emotion and experience, but in some cases there are defined sets of facts that are clearly stated, yet ignored because they conflict with what we want to believe.
I once saw an experiment where two people voted on the sex of a rabbit. Even though the two votes were different, neither changed the fact that the rabbit was male/female.
This is where I see one of the biggest problems we face today. Information. To find out the sex of the rabbit, all you have to do is raise its leg, but how do we find the truth in more important matters? Matters where money and power, and the need for financial support can sway the information we’re given.
If it’s important to you that you know the truth, you may spend countless hours scouring documents to get the one piece of information you’re looking for, but if it’s something that doesn’t really matter or effect you on a personal basis, you just go with whatever opinion you like best because it’s just too time consuming to do otherwise. Possibly perpetuating the spreading of false facts.
A personal example of this:
I once tried to find out statistics about heart and lung disease in my home town. I heard that we are near the top of the list of areas for high industrial pollution (it was in the local paper,) but trying to match that against, say... the effects of second hand smoke, was damn near impossible. Those statistics are out there, I know they’re out there. But because they conflict with popular opinion, they’ve either been buried, or are just not available to the general public.
A more recent example:
Something about the hearing involving Michael Brown just didn’t sound right to me. If he were actually guilty of not doing his job, then why wasn’t he fired immediately? No ‘ifs’ ‘ands’ or ‘buts’ the man had a specific job to do, if he didn’t do it, why is there a debate? It took me less than ten minutes to find out exactly what his job entails. While it seems pretty open on what FEMA is suppose to do (seems to be mostly financial aid and coordinating resources,) it is quite clear what duties FEMA is not responsible for. My suspicions were right, from what we were shown of the hearing on the news, his actual duties were not even addressed.
And those are just two examples of the breakdown of knowledge.
So my final question is this: As the general public, how do we go about getting the actual facts when it seems that the actual facts are no longer important? How do we go about demanding to be told the truth?